SHaG in Public:
Our Peer Reviewed Publications and Papers

Our work has been published in many papers and journals in different categories across the field of sexual health and gender research, as listed below.

Sexual Consent, Accepted Atlantic Digital Sexual Consent, Accepted Atlantic Digital

Optional or Obligatory? Exploring Undergraduate University Students’ Attitudes, Opinions, and Beliefs of Verbal Sexual Consent

Citation

Matchett, B., Numer, M. (2021). Optional or Obligatory? Exploring Undergraduate University Students’ Attitudes, Opinions, and Beliefs of Verbal Sexual Consent. Healthy Populations Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15273/hpj.v1i2.10658.

Abstract:

Introduction: For the last 20 years, sexual assault on university campuses has occurred at epidemic levels. This may be caused by undergraduate students primarily using non-verbal cues to communicate sexual consent, despite high levels of miscommunication and misinterpretation. Explicit, verbalized consent is known to lead to fewer misinterpretations of consent; however, less is known about students’ beliefs around verbal consent. Objectives: To explore Canadianundergraduate students’ attitudes, opinions, and beliefs around verbal consent, and to investigate whether students believe verbal consent is always required during sexual encounters.

Methods: This study used a qualitative descriptive approach. Data was collected from 31 Canadian undergraduate students in a Human Sexuality course through an open-ended question embedded in an interactive course textbook. Students’ responses were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Many complexities exist in undergraduate students’ attitudes, opinions, and beliefs around verbal consent. Four major themes emerged from the data centring on familiarity, socio-cultural norms, reliance on non-verbal cues, and acknowledgement of the importance of verbal consent.

Conclusion: The majority of participants believed that verbal consent was not required in all sexual encounters. Partner familiarity was a significant factor in using verbal consent. Social norms such as verbal consent being viewed as awkward or embarrassing were key barriers to students’ use. Verbal consent was viewed as an ideal, while non-verbal consent was viewed as realistic

Link: https://ojs.library.dal.ca/hpj/article/view/10658/10005

Read More